Adobe (Temporarily?) Kills 64-Bit Flash For Linux
bartek047 at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 15 04:56:15 UTC 2010
--- On Mon, 6/14/10, Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org> wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 11:20 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> >> [snip]
> > I thought 10.1 was the one with the problem. In
> any case, I don't think the "hole" will cause much problems
> with Linux based systems. When you read of the panic
> attacks people are having, it's usually about Windows
> > B
> I believe 10.1 is supposed to be the "big fix" for problems
> 10.0.<something>. They wouldn't have release 10.1
> last Friday if it was
> supposed to have the serious fault they reported a few days
> would they? You cut the part of my message where I said
> 10.1 on a 32 bit
> machine appears to be causing kernel faults. If it can do
> that, who know
> what nasty things it could do if its insecure.
Well, 10.1 really "fixed" everything, didn't it? Even the Windows users had major problems with it.
A kernel fault? Bad code, probably. Do programmers do flow charts anymore?
More information about the users