NFS

Patrick O'Callaghan pocallaghan at gmail.com
Tue Jun 15 16:31:25 UTC 2010


On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:41 -0400, Ray Pittigher wrote:
> 
> On 06/15/2010 10:06 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > On 06/15/2010 04:21 AM, Tim wrote:
> >  > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 13:57 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
> >  >> Had the original admonishment been made in private
> >  >
> >  > This also comes up from time to time. It is a good thing to
> >  > occasionally publicly say don't top list, so that more than one person
> >  > sees the information.
> >  >
> >
> > I prefer private communications - those that remind others believe it
> > is a good thing - I believe they are very wrong.
> >
> > (1) I have seldom seen a positive flow coming from these random public
> > information attempts.
> >
> > (2) Furthermore, the chances of genuine education via this are at best
> > minimal - the signal/noise is of order 0.
> >
> > (3) An occasional post by the the list moderators (every 6 months to a
> > year perhaps) with the subject clearly showing information about forum
> > guidelines would be far better.
> >
> > So please keep it private - the bulk reading this list don't need
> > reminders.
> >
> > My view ...
> 
> So anyway I guess the answer is I can not look at open files on the
> server. What if I used systemtap..
 
I assume you're addressing the original question (in which case it
doesn't help comprehension that you quoted the above, by now quite OT,
since it has nothing to do with what you're talking about).

If you think systemtap is going to help you with your issue, you haven't
understood the replies so far. The problem is not that you can't get the
server to tell you about active clients, it's that the server doesn't
*know* about them. It has no concept of an "active client" in the way
you mean.

poc



More information about the users mailing list