About fedoras evolution?

[Dale J. Chatham]

Unless RedHat has cleaned up their act, RH support is a, well, joke.

The CentOS forums are a much better way to go.

It has been a couple of years since I tried to do so, but setting up a 
central CentOS updates repository is trivial.  Setting up one with RH is 
a bit of a chore and one has to wonder if it violates RH's license to do so.

On 06/16/2010 09:48 AM, birger wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>    
>> Agreed, but it's worth mentioning that CentOS tracks RHEL releases and
>> is available at no cost (and consequently no paid support).
>>      
> As my boss said it when I presented the budget forecast for my RHEL
> licenses; "It's less than the rounding errors in our other license
> budgets". Paying for basic support for RHEL should not be a problem.
> Actually, my biggest motivation for running CentOS on development and
> test servers is to avoid the technical part of the licensing hassle. And
> of course I run CentOS at home.
>
>    


-- 
Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution.
Let us not make it a blank paper by construction."

    --Thomas Jefferson, letter to Wilson Nicholas, 1803

There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
  -- Ed Howdershelt (Author)