Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

[David Boles]

On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>>>> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
>>>> effort to date.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>
>>> I believe this may be a newer build.  Not extensively checked, but it
>>> played a couple of cnn's video ok.
>>
>> Is this helpful?
>>
>> Version Test for Adobe Flash Player
>>
>> http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/155/tn_15507.html
>>
> About plugins shows it correctly, that page does not.
> [root at coyote Download]# ls -l| grep flash
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 gene gene  11796480 2010-06-07 11:43 
> flashplayer10_1_rc7_linux_060210.so.tar
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 gene gene   4121963 2010-05-02 06:37 flash-plugin-10.0.45.2-
> release.i386.rpm
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 gene gene   4755181 2010-06-16 11:52 flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-
> release.i386.rpm
> 
> The above is what I have installed.
> 
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 gene gene   3731155 2010-04-16 21:31 
> libflashplayer-10.0.45.2.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 gene gene   9570824 2010-01-27 00:05 libflashplayer.so*


Everything you list is old and why does it appear that you have so many
versions of Flash installed?

The 10.1 r53 is the latest. The .4x versions are the buggy releases. As
I read it.

Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have to
use a 32bit browser.

The site (the URL I posted) is an official Adobe Flash ID site. If it
misidentifies what you have installed I would think that the problem
might be yours.

-- 


  David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100616/1e25428c/attachment.bin