Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

[David Boles]

On 6/16/2010 5:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:22 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>>>> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
>>>> to use a 32bit browser.
>>>
>>> Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-bit Flash works with it. In fact
>>> I'm guessing that any browser that sandboxes plugins in separate
>>> processes should work.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gene uses 64-bit Firefox, I think, and he was using the 64bit Flash. I
>> gave him the link. Naively. The 32-bit Flash will work with Firefox and
>> a wrapper. He did not ask about that.
>>
>> As for Chromium? This thread was not about Chromium but I'll take your
>> word on that.
> 
> It wasn't about Firefox either.



Hmm... Good point. But I know Gene and I answered it with personal
knowledge in mind. But you are correct.



>> I tried it and did not like it.
> 
> Fair enough, but I wasn't trying to push Chromium as such.

I did not mean to imply that you had. Linux is all about choice. And
using what works for you.
-- 


  David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100616/1aa750bb/attachment.bin