ubertekton at comcast.net
Wed Jun 30 00:31:30 UTC 2010
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 02:48:30 pm Michael Hennebry wrote:
> "Fool." was deliberately ambiguous.
> That was its point.
> I stated that Carroll was smarter than you because
> Carroll noticed that "Fool." was top-posted.
> It was a clue.
> As I have little evidence regarding the smartness of Carroll,
> I expect one can be less smart than Carroll without being a fool.
> Beyond this quotation, lies only my signature lines.
If that is the extent of your argument, than no apologies required. If not
offensive than certainly silly.
More information about the users