ssh to my computer behind NAT

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 19:44:36 -0400,
  Tom Horsley <horsley1953 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:44:56 -0430
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> 
> > If your mailer supports it, Reply-To-List is preferable to Reply-To-All
> > on mailing lists. It uses the List-* headers to figure out the correct
> > posting address.
> 
> You happen to know any mailers that support it? I've never seen that
> one before. Usually just Reply works for me because the mailing
> list has fixed up the Reply-To header, but not all lists do that.

mutt has list-reply bound to 'L' by default.

The normal reply command is not supposed to reply to lists, just the sender.