Sorbet on Fedora's future

[Tom H]

> The OP has a point however inept he is at getting it across. The problem
> is larger because it is his expectation that Fedora is apparently
> supposed to provide him with some level of software stability that is at
> odds with the development speed, the release early and often philosphy,
> the 'leading edge' philosophy that Fedora has embraced to help drive
> development. Obviously you understand that there are 'stable' releases
> out there that don't churn every 6 months, that don't latch onto the
> latest versions of xorg, pulseaudio, glibc, etc. and all the attendant
> issues caused by newer versions but the OP doesn't get it at all.

Exactly. The OP is expecting from Fedora what it is not; and what
Ubuntu is not, in spite of its upcoming "LTS" release. F12 and U 9.10
were released a few weeks apart and they both had the same teething
problems (with Ubuntu having the extra burden of grub2 - whose bugs
had been mostly ironed out by release time - but with which the users
were totally unfamiliar). What the OP seems to want is some Fedora
version of CentOS or Debian Stable...