Evolution and GPG signing?

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 01:54 +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > possibly somewhere along the line the HTML is being reflowed or in
> > some way modified, which would destroy the signature. I can't really
> > see how that could happen
> 
> We've seen plenty of plain text message parts being transcoded in
> transit by some allegedly "helpful" mail server (turning quoted
> printable into 8-bit, etc.).  I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised
> at a mail server doing the same sort of thing to text/html content.

Quite, but the OP says it all works properly if he sticks to TB. Even
allowing for the difference between inline PGP and PGP/MIME, it would
seem particularly perverse of the intermediate server to mess with one
and not the other. But I guess stranger things have happened ...

poc