I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:01:57 -0300
Fernando Cassia <fcassia at gmail.com> wrote:

> > So, I don't see any compelling reason to keep both around. It's a
> > great deal more maint for not much work.
> 
> Right now, they´re "about the same". Going forward, I see Oracle
> continuing with OpenOffice.org and making it MORE integrated with -and
> making use of-  Java, not less.

So, you want to stick with openoffice.org because you think it will use
more java? I don't see any reason or statement from libreoffice that
they intend to go away from java, do you? Also, already the development
pace in libreoffice is greatly sped up from openoffice. They landed a
bunch of RTF improvements recently, along with merging tons of patches
vendors have been carrying for a long time. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101104/011f2423/attachment.bin