I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?
Sam Varshavchik
mrsam at courier-mta.com
Sat Nov 6 00:03:45 UTC 2010
Paul Otheim writes:
> Oh, wait. Their licensing policy make that impossible. Unless they
> change them, of course. What a pickle they're in, huh?
>
> P.S. One thing I do agree on -- LibreOffice needs a better name.
>
>
>
> How about Free Office ;^ ) *BLATANT SUPPOSITION FOLLOWS* That's BFS, FUD's
I actually like "Free Office". I think it's a bit better. It had to have
been considered, if they ended up with "LibreOffice". It had to have been.
I'm guessing they had to go with LibreOffice because of the domain name
availability.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101105/3d9d3e1f/attachment.bin
More information about the users
mailing list