... why top-posting should be avoided... (was Re: Broken mail readers (was Re: Properly wiping a hard drive ?))
g
geleem at bellsouth.net
Mon Oct 11 03:20:58 UTC 2010
On 10/10/2010 09:40 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> JD wrote:
>> On 10/10/2010 01:22 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
<snip>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 October 2010 21:01, Tim<ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 09:02 -0500, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
<GBFSNIP>
> Has anyone ever noticed that gmail (and likely a lot of other online email
> services and desktop software) opens a gap at the top for typing the
> response?
not really.
it matters little what programmers due if users/repliers do what is asked.
just because the space is there, does not mean you have to use it.
but i did notice how you failed to 'trim dead wood'.
<snip>
> but I see post after post prefixed with >>> and no threading.)
sort of like a part of this is because you did not trimmed what you
should have?
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101011/db15534a/attachment.bin
More information about the users
mailing list