nspluginwrapper

[g]

On 04/22/2011 06:17 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
<>

> Without nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in the same process as
<>

> With nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in separate processes.
<>

ahhh. yes. you refreshed the brain cells. [should stick this time] this
was discussed in a 'support-firefox at lists.mozilla.org' thread last year.

> Presumably, this also means that the plugins can run on separate
> hardware threads¹: whether this makes any difference to browser
> responsiveness is something I have neither investigated nor seen anyone
> else investigate.

one would think so. this ability was not discussed.

-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110422/81c33dc2/attachment.bin