NFS shared directory permission (rhel6)
Jatin K
ssh.fedora at gmail.com
Mon Aug 1 13:25:55 UTC 2011
On Monday 01 August 2011 06:41 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
>>> Before getting into specific issues that can cause this...
>>>
>> If you intend to use POSIX ACLs with NFSv4 forget about it, because user
>> umask is always applied at the client side over the default POSIX ACLs
>> making difficult to have for example rw directory/files for some group
>> of users.
> That is part of what I am trying to discover by asking him for the
> output I wrote and more about the authentication/authorization situation
> on the network. There are a large number of reasons permissions can get
> kajiggered over the network with NFSv4 or AFS, and in an office
> environment doubly so because of the prevalence of LDAP, NIS and
> Kerberos deployments, along with SELinux fun tossed in.
>
> -Iwao
no there is no LDAP or NIS like stuff
I'm thinking to use ACL on that directory based on the user groups ( in
my scenario it will be office user groups )
thanks for your valuable inputs and suggestions
Warm Regards
--
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Jatin Khatri
Registerd Linux user No #501175
www.counter.li.org
No M$
More information about the users
mailing list