Fedora - time to blink

[Ian Malone]

On 1 December 2011 13:02, Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Tim <ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 23:09 +0000, Pedro Francisco wrote:
>>> Right thread though,
>>
>> May be (as few of us can remember the origins of this thread), but
>> you've replied at the wrong point.  By this time the conversation has
>> changed, and your reply has nothing to do with the message that you've
>> replied to.  And that's what replies should be (one message in reply to
>> another *particular* message).  You need to go further back, and make
>> your reply to the right place.  It's the only way that it'll make any
>> sense to anybody reading it.
>
> I'm not following your point. I replied to the first message, the one
> which started the thread.
>

> I saw a bad review, quickly scanned the thread to see if anyone else
> had seen a pattern on what was working badly (networking related) and
> decided to add my information, namely the peripheral possibly
> responsible and a possible solution which I'm occasionaly working on.
>

Indeed, it's been so long since the thread started and the original
post was only worth such a cursory glance that most people have
probably forgotten this was a detail in the review (I know I had).

Just thought I'd chime in that my laptop is still happily using
iwl3945 in F16 without noticeable connection problems. (Yes, it's
faster if I connect it via ethernet, but I've always expected that.)
Thanks if you're actually working on improving support for this
chipset.

-- 
imalone