Buy an SSD now, or wait?

[Joe Zeff]

On 12/23/2011 11:34 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> That's not exactly true. The radiation is quite easy to measure, and there is
> no need for increased sensitivity of the detectors.

It all depends on which radiation you're talking about.  There was talk 
in the early days after the quake and tsunami about detecting 
radioisotopes crossing the Pacific, with the implication that the US 
West Coast was in danger of major contamination.  What was actually 
detected were minute traces that wouldn't have triggered the detectors 
in use at the time of Chernobyl.  That's what I was referring to, and 
I'll admit in hindsight that I should have been more specific.