F16 - a good experience

[Aaron Konstam]

On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 11:34 +0000, mike cloaked wrote: 
> I know that recently some folk have posted of bad experiences with f16
> - however I am running f16 on 6 machines (4 laptops and 2 desktops)
> with 4 x86_64 and 2 i686 - and all are now stable, and running with a
> responsive and crisp xfce desktop.  I can do everything that I need to
> do, and one of the machines is a server and has performed flawlessly
> since its install about a month ago.
> 
> Yes it does need some love and attention to get things configured and
> set up working as desired (and some lookups and learning) - but I am
> really pretty happy overall with f16 now - so this is general thank
> you to all developers and testers in getting f16 to a good working
> state - of course there are some residual bugs which need squashing
> (Name "any" system has zero bugs after all!).
> 
> Have a great New Year all.
> 
> -- 
> mike c

You created. The major bad experiences that were reported were Gnome
3.2 :-)
-- 
=======================================================================
Vail's Second Axiom: The amount of work to be done increases in
proportion to the amount of work already completed.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam at sbcglobal.net