Yet another problem with this list

[James McKenzie]

On 2/12/11 9:02 AM, Darr wrote:
> On Friday, February 11, 2011 @23:22 zulu,
> Fernando Cassia<fcassia at gmail.com>  scribed:
>
> =b=e=g=i=n==p=a=s=t=e=s=
>
> From: Fernando Cassia<fcassia at gmail.com>
> Precedence: list
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Cc: "fedora-list at redhat.com"<fedora-list at redhat.com>
> To: Community support for Fedora users<users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> References:<4D54534B.7060309 at earthlink.net>
> In-Reply-To:<4D54534B.7060309 at earthlink.net>
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:49:24 -0300
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users<users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Message-ID:<AANLkTinuc1AgXbKH6-iTPZmcNS7gJZ1P=jJJoWc=Zxv9 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Subject: Re: No need for AV tools on Linux, eh?
> Message: 7
>
> You must have received a couple bounce messages then.
He won't.  The address is forwarded to the new mailing list.  Thus 
duplicates are created.
> Above are the complete messages with headers from both of them as they
> appeared in Digest, Vol 84, Issue 32.
> Note they were message #'s 7 and 8 in the digest.
>
> Perhaps the messages to fedora-list at redhat.com are scrubbed from the email
> list (the duplicate/CC does not appear in the web archive), but they are
> both sent to the digest.
Yes, Mailman should recognize them as duplicates and drop them. 
Sometimes, it does not.

James McKenzie