SELinux

[Tim]

On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 01:37 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> I see no need for SELinux on what is, while potentially multi user,
> essentially single user system. I run behind two (count 'em) two
> hardware firewalls both of them doing NAT. I've never had one,
> not even one, IP tables violation.

You're only thinking of problems due to incoming networking connections.
That's only a small part of the equation.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.