iptables and NAT [SOLVED]
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Fri Jan 28 14:12:29 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:31 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
> yes it is
Is there a device ahead of this that is firewalling?
Because if you're providing a website accessible to the public, there's
no doubt that someone will try to hack you.
If you were doing what was discussed earlier on (putting in access and
prerouting rules, to the webserver), and /that/ worked. Then changing
your input policy to drop, gives you firewalling (i.e. deny everything,
except the specify exception rules you put in).
--
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
More information about the users
mailing list