DAMNED Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

[JD]

On 07/02/2011 05:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 03.07.2011 02:17, schrieb JD:
>> When I knowingly and deliberately browse my files,
>> cannot be deemed to be the same as a javascript
>> that some web site sends to my computer to be executed
>> by the browser to snoop on my files.
> why do you not stop talking about things you do not understand
> show me the javascript to access any local file or shut up
>> Javascripts sent by web sites are a threat to privacy
>> and even security
> if the browser has bugs yes
> but not by design
>
>> Have you used spawn used in javascript?
>> In fact you can spawn multiple threads from a javascript.
> you can not start executebales outside javascript
> and javascript has by design no capabilitys to send
> local files to web without user interaction
>
>> And just who/what would prevent a javascript
>> from examining your cookies? Your browser? :)
> yes the browser or who is executing javascript?
> you can not access cookies of foreign domains
> so what the fuck is your problem?
>
>> You seem to be a professional ostrich
> i am professional web developer and you are a noob ranting about
> things you basicaly not understand
>
>> Bury your head in the sand if you wish
>> and say you see no threat in javascripts
>> pushed by websites.
> if the browser has no bugs there is no one
> and that the browser can have bugs is no argument because with
> this arguments you must not start any software
>
>> If your myopia were reality, why would
>> people start to take a much harder look at
>> javascripts, and try find ways to foil them?
> it si a difference that peopole always try find bugs and use them against
> users and you foolish rant like "stop integrate javascript in webbrowsers"
>
I do understand why you are so shrill in defending
javascript, and resorting to cussing and name calling.
Apparently it is your bread and butter :)