Overwriting a 4096 byte sector harddisk drive with random data
yudi.tux at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 10:15:39 UTC 2011
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Gilboa Davara <gilboad at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 19:48 +1000, yudi v wrote:
> > Hi
> > From what I understand, the first command above will write data in
> > 512 byte blocks, the second one in 1MB blocks, and the third in 4096
> > byte blocks. Right?
> The 1M should also yield considerably better performance. (Though the
> random number generator may cap the performance in this case).
> - Gilboa
Sorry, could you please elaborate a bit more on how a higher size block
results in better performance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users