Routing not working

[Genes MailLists]

On 06/01/2011 12:32 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:07:54 -0400

> 
> ifconfig says:
> 
> em1       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:4F:9A:D6:E5  
>           inet addr:10.134.30.143  Bcast:10.134.30.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::21e:4fff:fe9a:d6e5/64 Scope:Link

    ipv6 looks on to me ..

> 
> mon.wlan0 Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 94-44-52-45-F3-3A-E0-F1-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

   I suppose this has something to do with hostapd ?


> 
> wlan0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 94:44:52:45:F3:3A  
>           inet addr:192.168.9.1  Bcast:192.168.9.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::9644:52ff:fe45:f33a/64 Scope:Link

    ditto
> 

> Here's ip route:
> 
> 10.134.30.0/24 dev em1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.134.30.143 
> 192.168.9.0/24 dev wlan0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.9.1 
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev em1  scope link  metric 1002 
> default via 10.134.30.196 dev em1 

  I assume the default route is to your internet gateway ..

> 
> Here's ip addr show:

> 2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:1e:4f:9a:d6:e5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 10.134.30.143/24 brd 10.134.30.255 scope global em1
>     inet6 fe80::21e:4fff:fe9a:d6e5/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 94:44:52:45:f3:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.9.1/24 brd 192.168.9.255 scope global wlan0
>     inet6 fe80::9644:52ff:fe45:f33a/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 4: mon.wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
>     link/ieee802.11/radiotap 94:44:52:45:f3:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> Here's /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> 
> 1
> 
> I'm starting to wonder if the ralink driver it is using is
> just flaky on f15.

   Possible - I think I'd try turning off IPV6 first .. to make sure its
not interfering in some way .. probably not but might not hurt to test that.