Networking problem
JD
jd1008 at gmail.com
Sat May 14 18:13:21 UTC 2011
On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote:
>
>> On Fedora Machine:
>> # /bin/netstat -rn
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
>> Iface
>> 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
>> eth0
>> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
>> wlan0
>> 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
>> eth0
>> 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
>> virbr0
>> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
>> wlan0
>>
>>
> ...
>
>> On Fedora machine:
>>
>> # /sbin/ifconfig
>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:0D:15:2B:9E
>> inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::203:dff:fe15:2b9e/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:1340 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:849 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:174589 (170.4 KiB) TX bytes:418153 (408.3 KiB)
>> Interrupt:19 Base address:0xd800
>>
>> eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:0D:15:2B:9E
>> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> Interrupt:19 Base address:0xd800
>>
>
> ..
>
>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43
>> inet6 addr: fe80::234:56ff:fe00:343/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:4976669 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:4947232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:1062494718 (1013.2 MiB) TX bytes:500756007 (477.5 MiB)
>>
>> wlan0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43
>> inet addr:192.168.1.108 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>
>>
>
> 1) Something looks odd here - the netstat above seems to show eth0
> have 10.0.x.x and wlan0 being on 10.1.x.x.
>
> The ifconfig has
>
> eth0 on 10.1.1.1 and a second IP of 10.0.0.1
> wlan0 has IP6 address + 192.168.1.108
>
> 2) This looks a bit strange - notwithstanding that, it has no
> interfaces which respond to 192.168.1.1 ... is this the right machine ?
>
> If not - and you want it to respond to 192.168.1.1 you should have
> that configured on at least one interface ... no?
>
>
The eth0 is not active. It is configured with a static IP, but it is
disconnected.
Ditto on the PowerBook machine. It is configured with a static IP
but is is disconnected, so the ether links on both machines is down.
Only the wireless is active.
I do not understand why you say I have an IP6 address.
the LAN is on IP4 addresses.
More information about the users
mailing list