Protected WLAN

JD jd1008 at gmail.com
Wed May 18 01:53:32 UTC 2011


On 05/17/11 18:07, g wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 11:44 PM, JD wrote:
> <>
>
>> You call youtube a credible publication?
> yes/no.
>
> they do have all different ways of cracking wep, wpa, and wpa2
> that are mentioned in this thread.
>
> just a few from my bookmarks, which where easy to find via a little
> google time;
>
>    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdJuXtjgIrA&feature=related
>    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG9i2VPY_LE&NR=1
>    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lNqqryPBNU&NR=1
>    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P8l-PsvYak&NR=1
>    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP1BOZqrp5g&feature=related
>
> along with a few non youtube;
>
>    http://hackerwhacker.com/
>    http://whacker2.hackerwhacker.com/
>    http://wi-foo.com/
>    http://www.linux-wireless.com/Sniffers/
>
> all of which goes to show, if you want to spend a little time to
> find out how to hack wlan/wifi, spend a little time on google.
>
>
Well, I hate to disappoint anyone, but until
I see a credible security researchers/professors
show in a scientific publication that they
were able to crack wpa2-psk/AES using PC's
and in reasonable time (say a few days), then
I would believe it. Youtube is no source of truth.




More information about the users mailing list