Is btrfs ready to be default fs in F17 ?
fcassia at gmail.com
Sun Nov 6 14:20:22 UTC 2011
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 07:30, Alan Cox <alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> Plus in a funny way btrfs is now in part un-needed,
Funny how so many people think the btrfs designers are morons.
Or as if it were a half-baked project cooked hours ago.BTRFS is five years
"In 2008, the principal developer of the ext3<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext3>
and ext4 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4> file systems, Theodore
stated that although ext4 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4> has improved
features, it is not a major advance, it uses old technology, and is a
stop-gap; Ts'o believes that Btrfs is the better direction because "it
offers improvements in scalability, reliability, and ease of
also has "a number of the same design ideas
BTRfsck is coming along nicely
so, let´s cut the FUD, please...
"The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers."
Richard Hamming - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_code
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users