F15 preupgrade: lots of uneraseable dupes
alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Tue Oct 11 10:03:55 UTC 2011
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:13:20 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 03:10 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 15:52, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> It is a fact. There is a lot of empirical proof for this. Scripts are
> >> good for single purpose small cases. Once you want to deal with complex
> >> problems, a script won't scale. Error handling isn't as sophisticated
> >> for instance.
> > I do not agree. A script can be as good with as good error-handling as
> > its programmer wants it to be.
> Not really. There are limitations of the language. Bash just isn't
> going to be as sophisticated as say Java regardless of how good the
> programmer is.
Mathematically speaking that isn't true. It might be a lot prettier but
the capabilities of the two are basically identical (assuming in the sh
case you use a few apps run from the script anyway)
More information about the users