Remote access

Tim ignored_mailbox at
Sat Oct 15 11:25:06 UTC 2011

On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 23:05 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Let me phrase in like this --- when some rules in some legal system
> seize to make actual sense, it is legitimate to challenge them.

There's a big difference between calling stupidity to attention, and
deliberately breaking the rules rather than working to have them
changed.  Worse still, encouraging someone else to break the rules, as
you *have* done in this thread.

[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.

More information about the users mailing list