Gdm removed when sugar WM removed

[Mikkel L. Ellertson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/23/2011 03:14 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 12:55 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> How do you determine whether or not a given wm needs gdm? Any wm can equally
>> well use kdm instead of gdm, so it is actually a conditional dependency ---
>> "if there is no other dm installed, and if there is some wm which depends on
>> the presence of a dm, don't uninstall it".
> 
> Can you tell me one good reason that a dm should be a dependency of any wm?

That is a good question. If you boot to the cli, and use startx, you
do not need one. But if you make installing xdm part of installing
X, you are not using that much extra space. If you want a fancier
dm, install it.

Mikkel
- -- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk6keiIACgkQqbQrVW3JyMQFNQCfX8UqlpK+fgKlNkqCBKUBEf6j
Q7QAn05i/9OALUIdKHFUxnIZaCbr36cK
=KHqG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----