Mobile 'ish Desktop (Read GNOME 3) vs Traditional, Desktop, (Read KDE

[Joe Feely]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> On 04/03/2012 08:03 PM, Joe Feely wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/04/12 13:00, users-request at lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>>> Mobile 'ish Desktop (Read GNOME 3) vs Traditional Desktop
>>> (Read KDE
>> I have gone the XFCE route, but failing that I would have picked the
>> KDE route.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> What made you opting that route?

I liked Gnome 2, it just allowed me to work in a way I liked (i.e. my
preference), I found Gnome 3 wouldn't easily accommodate my preferences.
XFCE is close enough to Gnome 2 and closer than anything else I've
tried. I used KDE for a short time, well before KDE 4, and found that
okay, but I simply preferred the look and feel of Gnome 2.
I like to put certain apps in certain workspaces and like them to stay
there. I found M$ Windows (long time ago, maybe it's caught up) way too
frustrating with having to minimise loads of windows just to make way
for what I wanted to do next.

If you're asking for my view, the above is part of it. If you're asking
for which way to go, then go play with a bunch of them (as seems to be
what many have suggested in previous postings).

Have fun,
Joe

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPeyY6AAoJEGgCZ2pTomv8Z2YIALYzIOJ725iJf4iT9Z/bqSoI
H30nml8VNI91DMUZuD21iWM3QD4fICXPbMYPYf/bTfNUNmSPv5871jjwgAKm1UAf
e32BVEZD8v39o4yHOOiKWCE4X52MVyWz9swInZzsquOjmmYi+vyUvonspJBzZu2m
mAJkBjUKI8pPxaOwLCTaMq8NZtcvep9du+AAfYM+rlLW7LUEnc6bF00aMJK6ZTsd
IjvLYQJGBAQEDzes/dvuxL+5Ah78RXPNG6gkOiwKNlq8uUaQ3i6zvxIBx9/FhPP6
/BN3rqEUAcz6xwKZrG5KSW1l0ptQ0TwRyicbLv64qzBPHvN43L8rmIyKE7YNk90=
=YAlV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----