criminal use of linux [not]

[M. Fioretti]

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 12:27:25 PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 2 August 2012 11:36, M. Fioretti <mfioretti at nexaima.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 08:13:33 AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> >
> >> licensing of compiled binaries can be interesting depending on your
> >> compiler license
> >
> > Ian,
> > could you provide some concrete example of this?
> >
> 
> This is the from the Visual C++ Express 2010 license:
> '2.	ADDITIONAL LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND/OR USE RIGHTS.
> Distributable Code. The software contains code that you are permitted
> to distribute in programs you develop if you comply with the terms
> below.

as far as I understand from this quote, this is not the compiler
license, but is (regardless of where it is written) the license of
those bunches of code. But it's not important, I'll find and read more
myself now that I have a precise reference, thanks!

Marco
-- 
http://mfioretti.com