qtiplot

[Richard Shaw]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Patrick Dupre <pdupre at kegtux.org> wrote:
> But now I have another one:
>
> /usr/lib64/qt4/bin/moc -DQTIPLOT_PRO -DSCRIPTING_CONSOLE
> -DSVN_REVISION="\"\"" -DQT_PLUGIN
> -DTRANSLATIONS_PATH=\"/usr/share/qtiplot/translations\"
> -DMANUAL_PATH=\"/usr/share/doc/qtiplot-0.9.8.3/manual\" -DSCRIPTING_MUPARSER
> -DSCRIPTING_PYTHON -DPYTHON_CONFIG_PATH=\"/usr/share/qtiplot\"
> -DGL2PS_HAVE_LIBPNG -DEMF_OUTPUT -DTEX_OUTPUT -DODS_IMPORT -DOPJ_IMPORT
> -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SVG_LIB -DQT_QT3SUPPORT_LIB -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_XML_LIB
> -DQT_OPENGL_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED
> -I/usr/lib64/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/QtCore
> -I/usr/include/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/QtGui -I/usr/include/QtOpenGL
> -I/usr/include/QtXml -I/usr/include/Qt3Support -I/usr/include/QtSvg
> -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/QtAssistantClient -I/usr/include/QtAssistant
> -I../3rdparty/qwt/src -I../3rdparty/qwtplot3d/include -I/usr/include/gsl
> -Iicons -Isrc/analysis -Isrc/analysis/dialogs -Isrc/core -Isrc/lib/include
> -Isrc/lib/3rdparty/qtcolorpicker/src -Isrc/plot2D -Isrc/plot2D/dialogs
> -Isrc/plot3D -Isrc/matrix -Isrc/table -Isrc/scripting
> -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/libEMF -I/usr/include/minizip
> -I/usr/include/quazip -I/usr/include/liborigin2 -Isrc/origin
> -I/usr/X11R6/include
> -I/home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILD/qtiplot-0.9.8.3/tmp/qtiplot
> src/lib/include/SymbolBox.h -o ../tmp/qtiplot/moc_SymbolBox.cpp
> src/origin/importOPJ.cpp: In member function 'bool
> ImportOPJ::createProjectTree(const OriginFile&)':
> src/origin/importOPJ.cpp:200:65: error: invalid conversion from 'time_t {aka
> long int}' to 'boost::date_time::special_values' [-fpermissive]
> /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/ptime.hpp:49:5: error:
> initializing argument 1 of
> 'boost::posix_time::ptime::ptime(boost::date_time::special_values)'
> [-fpermissive]
>
> Any idea how to solve it?

Well, I'm pretty good at troubleshooting missing headers and libraries
but I'm no C programmer. Looks like something that will have to be
patched in the source. Perhaps this is one of those areas where gcc is
more strict that previous versions?