grub vs. grub2
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Sun Feb 12 12:32:56 UTC 2012
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 22:20 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> The bottom line is that grub's days are numbered. grub2 is the future.
> No amount of complaining is going to change that. Even if someone
> stepped up to the plate and volunteered to maintain grub going
> forward, I wouldn't rely on it, in perpetuity.
I think I'd be happier if someone could make GRUB 2 less of a nightmare
of files everywhere. It's become more fiddly to play with than Apache.
--
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
More information about the users
mailing list