grub vs. grub2

Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Sun Feb 12 12:32:56 UTC 2012


On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 22:20 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> The bottom line is that grub's days are numbered. grub2 is the future.
> No amount of complaining is going to change that. Even if someone
> stepped up to the plate and volunteered to maintain grub going
> forward, I wouldn't rely on it, in perpetuity.

I think I'd be happier if someone could make GRUB 2 less of a nightmare
of files everywhere.  It's become more fiddly to play with than Apache.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.





More information about the users mailing list