dumb question

[g]

On 01/04/2012 08:22 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
<>

> And that's the confusion on my end. You are stating that Marvin says 
> "make it +x" and you are saying it doesn't need to be. I asked this dumb 
> question to find out how I should treat this situation regardless of 
> "what works". Its about understanding whether a makefile is an 
> executable or if make is just treating it as input and the executable 
> part is under the hood.
-=-

in addition to;

  [man|info] .

have a look at;

  [man|info] make

  [man|info] bash

  [man|info] tcsh

*note*

  .sh  = bash
  .csh = tcsh


to save your self time, try running '[man|info] word/command' to see
how something work. then when you get confused, post to list for
further confusion. 8-D

-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
So I installed Linux.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120104/1d9c89b9/attachment.sig>