[ why i do not like base64]

[g]

On 01/20/2012 10:48 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
<>

> Don't know why you conclude that, spam links can have a short lifetime
> as they get shut down.
-=-

i must be smoking something stronger than you. B=D

i do not recall, nor see where i made such statement, or imply.


> FWIW I do agree base64 is an unfriendly way to send email text bodies.
-=-

supposed reasoning is base64 compresses.

adverse - can not be searched by some email clients.

example - thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (20111108)

-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
So I installed Linux.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120120/69ea8cb5/attachment.sig>