glxgear and glxinfo confusion

[Reindl Harald]

Am 21.01.2012 20:08, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
> On 01/21/2012 04:30 AM, Markku Kolkka wrote:
>> 21.1.2012 10:08, Jatin K kirjoitti:
>>> I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
>>> According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabled but glxgear[3]
>>> output shows very low FPS
>> The answer is included in the glxinfo output:
>>
>>> [3]------ glxgears
>>>
>>> Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The framerate should be
>>> approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
> Right.  You want it to look more like this:
> [mlapier at mushroom ~]$ glxgears
> 20670 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4133.959 FPS
> 20746 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4149.087 FPS
> 20731 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4146.106 FPS
> 20744 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4148.615 FPS
> 20741 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4148.097 FPS
> 20570 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4113.860 FPS
> 20724 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4144.629 FPS

glxgears IS NOT a becnhmark and was never one!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120121/d83e9ff5/attachment.sig>