sylpheed plugins for F16

Ranjan Maitra maitra at iastate.edu
Tue Jan 31 21:14:37 UTC 2012


On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:34:19 +0100 Christoph Wickert
<christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Am Samstag, den 28.01.2012, 11:27 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:24:38 -0600, RM (Ranjan) wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I have a question with regard to the sylpheed installation in F16. I
> > > was wondering where the plugins are? (Specifically, the  According to
> > > the source file, the plugins are to be installed by make install-plugin,
> > > however the created .so file(s) do not appear to be there. Does that
> > > mean that the rpm was created without using this? If so, is this
> > > something that should be bugzilla'd?
> > 
> > That could be true. You seem to be familiar enough with Sylpheed
> > to file a bug report: http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/sylpheed
> > 
> > In the build log found here,
> >   http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=262597
> > one can observe how it builds an "attachment_tool.so" plugin, but
> > doesn't install it during "make install". Further, on x86_64 it builds
> > the plugin with -DPLUGINDIR=\""/usr/lib/sylpheed/plugins"\  which
> > isn't correct. The plugin directory entry is not included in the
> > package either. If a separate "make install-plugin" is needed, that
> > could be a packaging bug indeed.
> 
> Good catch, Michael!
> 
> I know I had looked into this earlier but decided to not do it because
> by that time there only was the 'test' plugin.
> 
> I have issued an update with plugins now. Find it at
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sylpheed-3.2.0-0.3.beta5.fc16
> 
> Regards,
> Christoph

Thanks, Christoph! I look forward to using the plugin.

Ranjan


More information about the users mailing list