Red Hat Will Pay Microsoft To Get Past UEFI Restrictions

[Tim]

On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 15:20 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> "Mandatory. On non-ARM systems, the platform MUST implement the
> ability for a physically present user to select between two Secure
> Boot modes in firmware setup: "Custom" and "Standard".

I'm curious about other differences that might occur while you're
running the system in the non-secured mode.  Are we going to find that
bank sites can detect your running mode, and refuse access, for
instance?

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.