Fedora 17

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Jun 18 16:54:00 UTC 2012



Am 18.06.2012 18:50, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 06/18/2012 09:36 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> When the default DE has aspects they are prima faca evidence
>> that the GNOME developers were not thinking clearly in including them
>> Gnome should be given an ultimatum that they straighten things out or
>> Fedora will find another DE to supply to its users.
> 
> Yes, that might work, if (and only if) the Gnome devs care about having Gnome be the default DE for Fedora.  Do you
> have any evidence that they give a rat's ass?

if they do not than this hsould be anough to throw
away it as default DE - what better reasons are need
to switch?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120618/2a127a51/attachment.sig>


More information about the users mailing list