Cannot find valid baseurl for rpmfusion repo
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 at ntlworld.com
Fri Jun 29 20:05:18 UTC 2012
On 06/29/2012 08:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.2012 17:08, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> On 06/29/2012 03:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> where is any single benfit in creating a local repo
>>> to put the one-shot RPMs compared between
>>>
>>> "yum install localfile.rpm"
>>> or
>>> "yum install --nogpgcheck localfile.rpm"
>>>
>>> ????
>>>
>>> there is no difference from any point of view
>>>
>>>
>> I then find it puzzling that you're having problems
> i find it puzzling that you believe i have problems
> how comes? my systems are working since many years
> on many many fedora setups and a local repo was never
> a solution for anything
Well that doesn't mean it never will be, does it? I use a shared local
repo on my LAN so I can update multiple machines without downloading the
same RPMs multiple times.
>
>> the method I outlined worked for me on both Fedora 16 and Fedora 17
> which does not mean that the overhead of your method
> has any benefit
Have you even tried it?
>
>> Apparently there is something different with
>> your method, and it causes you a problem for
>> reasons I don't know,
> again: how comes that you think i have any sproblem?
You do have a problem, an invalid url in a yum configuration for
RPMFusion when trying to configure using the supplied
setup RPM
>
>> so perhaps trying a different method can't do any harm surely
> knowing how yum and rpm is working is enough to qualify
> snakeoil like a local repo to solve "no valid baseurl"
> for a remote repo as useless
How does a local repo qualify has snakeoil? You appear to be quick to
dismiss it for what I consider very flimsy reasoning that in reality
amounts to your preferred methods.
More information about the users
mailing list