...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

Alan Cox alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Sat Mar 10 12:44:25 UTC 2012


> I hope the developers reconsider the decision to put extra "locks"
> where they are not needed at all.

a) module signing is just a feature you can use if you want

b) it's not really a lock. It's only a lock if you decide to enforce
module signature checking and not add any keys of your own

c) if you build a kernel you own the keys so you can lock it to just what
you want. That to many users is quite a valuable tool.

Plus of course in its most basic mode of a distro with signing
enforcement as shipped it completely and utterly shafts various dubious
non GPL out of tree modules 8)

Alan



More information about the users mailing list