grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Mar 19 00:49:12 UTC 2012



Am 19.03.2012 01:39, schrieb Ed Greshko:
> On 03/19/2012 08:09 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
>> The issue is that the order is coming up wrong. 
>> On my sytem, it adds the new kernel, but it is the in this order 
>> from the grub.cfg file.
>>
>> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.2.9-2.fc16.x86_64' 
>> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.2.9-2.fc16.x86_64 
>> (recovery mode)' 
>> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.2.9-1.fc16.x86_64' 
>> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.2.9-1.fc16.x86_64 
>> (recovery mode)' 
>> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.2.10-3.fc16.x86_64' 
>> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.2.10-3.fc16.x86_64 
>> (recovery mode)' 
>>
>> Thus 0 is the 3.2.9-2 kernel, and the new 3.2.10-3 would be 
>> number  4?
>>
>> Is yours listing 3.2.10-3 as being 0?
> 
> [root at meimei grub2]# grep menuen grub.cfg
> menuentry 'Fedora (3.2.10-3.fc16.i686.PAE)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class
> gnu --class os {
> menuentry 'Fedora (3.2.9-2.fc16.i686.PAE)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class
> gnu --class os {
> menuentry 'Fedora (3.2.9-1.fc16.i686.PAE)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class
> gnu --class os {
> 
> 
> But, now I am asking myself:  "Why don't I have recovery mode entries?".  :-(

because "/etc/default/grub" in Fedora contains GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY="true"?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120319/58033fee/attachment.sig>


More information about the users mailing list