Fedora disimprovements: am I alone?

[Timothy Murphy]

Claude Jones wrote:

>> But to return to boot-speed,
>> how could using systemctl be any faster than an exactly equivalent
>> command expressed in chkconfig terms?

> in other words, in can start services up in parallel, instead of waiting
> for each one to initiate before going to the next...

You misunderstood me.
If there has been this improvement - and I've seen a slight, not dramatic,
improvement - it could perfecly well have been taken up by chkconfig,
which as far as I can see just draws up (or drew up)
a list of daemons to start at boot-time.
How they were started does not seem to have much to do with chkconfig.

Incidentally, none of the systemctl advocates has answered my query:
How do I say "chkconfig openvpn on" in systemctl-speak?

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin