in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Sat Mar 31 18:54:11 UTC 2012


Matthew Saltzman wrote:

> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 03:30 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> 
>> KerTeX is not the one being reviewed or is it?
> 
> KerTeX is just another packaging of all the components that have been
> collected around TeX and LaTeX.  It's not the packaging that's of
> concern here, it's the individual components.  I'm sure including KerTeX
> would involve the same audit process.
> 
> On the other hand, getting the TeXLive audit done will benefit KerTeX as
> well, as everything that's common to the two collections will have been
> properly vetted.

Exactly, and in particular, any complaint about items removed from texlive 
due to this would apply equally to any KerTeX fedora packaging as well.

-- rex




More information about the users mailing list