Fedora 18 existing /usr partition -- need to merge into rootfs?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Tue Apr 2 10:09:19 UTC 2013



Am 02.04.2013 11:35, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Am 02.04.2013 11:23, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>
>>
>> Am 02.04.2013 11:14, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>>>> it makes ZERO sense to split /usr to a own partition you owuld really
>>>> clone a partition containing the whole system or share it with another
>>>> setup without the depending RPM database which lives in /var/lib/rpm/?
>>>>
>>>> sorry but the idea of a seperate /usr is broken at all
>>>
>>> This is FUD. The idea is perfectly fine and we should bring our OS in
>>> shape for doing it so
>>
>> so explain what is FUD in the simple fact that snapshot/clone a sperated
>> /usr where 99% of the files are from RPM packages while the RPM database is
>> NOT under /usr makes no sense?
>>
>> what do YOU imagine when as example (what was one of the arguments for
>> UsrMove) a snapshot of /usr is done before a upgrade which changes the RPM
>> database in /var/lib/rpm and you rollback to the snapshot while the RPM
>> database still has all updates?
>>
>> i can not imagine a better way to fuck up a OS-installation
>>
> 
> We are not there yet. The target should be to have rpms only install to /usr
> and then this rpm DB can live in /usr also. Of course rpm does not support
> multiple databases... yet

oh my god

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130402/5b1c0db2/attachment.sig>


More information about the users mailing list