Fedora vs RHEL

[Reindl Harald]

Am 19.04.2013 15:57, schrieb g:
> On 04/19/2013 03:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 19.04.2013 04:16, schrieb g:
>>> On 04/18/2013 07:26 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>>>> Since both CentOS and SL are rebuilds of RHEL. the 3rd party repos should
>>>> be compatible with either
>>>
>>> centos does a lot of chop and remove from rhel package and adds a lot of
>>> their own crud.
>>
>> please inform you before you spread FUD
>> they only replace logos etc. with Redhat copyeights
> 
> please inform you that you have not been reading where i have. had i not
> read such, i would not have posted such.

maybe you should not trust everything some random people
writes and blindly repeat it instead use official sources

http://www.centos.org/
CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendor's redistribution policy and
aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove
upstream vendor branding and artwork.)  CentOS is free.

> not to knock you use of english language, as you do fairly well, but you
> do have a problem with fingers hitting wrong keys, therefore, please to
> inform you, thunderbird does have a spelling checker

so what..............

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130419/ba3959be/attachment.sig>