Fedora vs RHEL

[Reindl Harald]

Am 20.04.2013 00:47, schrieb David Beveridge:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> http://www.centos.org/
>> CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendor's redistribution policy and
>> aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove
>> upstream vendor branding and artwork.)  CentOS is free.
>>
> see
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html
> 
> Controversy surrounds Red Hat's "obfuscated" source code release
> This change, noted by Maxillian Attems andLWN.net, appears to be aimed
> at Oracle, who like others, repackage Red Hat's source as the basis
> for its Unbreakable Linux

and how does this affect any of what i said above or
confirm the FUD from this thread?

the opposite is true, CentOS is NOT able to change ANYTHING
in the kernel of the 1:1 rebuild

* CentOS is rebuilding the src.rpms of RHEL
* the kernel src.rpm is public



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130420/a0619863/attachment.sig>