3840x2160 resolution?

[Laing, Robin]

On 2013-04-29 08:23, Tethys wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Joe Wulf <joe_wulf at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> It is configured to be a usable 16:9 aspect ratio.  Very pleased to see
>> that.
>
> I can't imagine why! 16:9 is pretty much the worst of the common
> monitor aspect ratios. It's a shame it's also the one that seems to be
> becoming most widespread.
>
> Tet
>
> --
> "Java is a DSL for taking large XML files and converting them to stack
> traces" -- Bulat Shakirzyanov
>

It would depend on what you are using it for.

I find that it can be useful having multiple windows open side by side 
for work.  I have become more productive with a 16:9 display compared to 
my 4:3 display.

My 5 cents worth.