3840x2160 resolution?
Ian Pilcher
arequipeno at gmail.com
Mon Apr 29 15:04:37 UTC 2013
On 04/29/2013 09:23 AM, Tethys wrote:
> I can't imagine why! 16:9 is pretty much the worst of the common
> monitor aspect ratios. It's a shame it's also the one that seems to be
> becoming most widespread.
I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment, but I'm willing to (someday)
give very large, very high definition 16x9 displays a chance. My
thinking is that a single 16x9 display of this sort can potentially
replace 2 side-by-side displays. (I.e. you're effectively going from
32x10 to 16x9.)
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno at gmail.com
Sometimes there's nothing left to do but crash and burn...or die trying.
========================================================================
More information about the users
mailing list