pomidorabelisima at gmail.com
Sun Dec 1 19:12:46 UTC 2013
On 01.12.2013 19:48, Beartooth wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:08:08 +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 25.11.2013 21:50, Beartooth wrote:
>>> In the past, I have always set my default browser to Dillo, which
>>> is very fast and very safe; and it usually shows me at least enough to
>>> guess reasonably well whether I want to go on, switch to another
>>> or skip the site.
>> Web browser with rudimentary https/ssl support you are considering safe
>> . Really?
> Yes. That has been part of its purpose for well over ten years,
> if not since inception. It does not accept cookies, nor keep a history
> file, for instance. It aims to be as nearly minimal as it can, short of
> being text-only. The idea, as with the early routers, is to have nothing
> there for a cracker to get hold of.
You've just confirmed that you do not know what you're talking about.
>> You too really don't have idea what you're talking about.
>> Don't you?
> Is it my imagination, or has the use of common courtesy dropped
> several levels lately?
As shown before, and now also you're unable to show appreciation to
people who help you.
More information about the users